|
|
 |
Colocall.net8.0
rating: 8, reviews: 9
|
Colocall.net is a colocation and hosting service that has been in operation for approximately 10 years. It offers a range of price plans, with the availability of the ImageMagick package included in all plans, distinguishing it from its competitor, Mirohost. The reliability of Colocall's performance is highly praised, with any issues that arise being promptly resolved. The hosting service offers a mid-range option priced at 60 hryvnas, but the quality of the service is the top priority .. Read more »for customers, even if they are willing to pay more. The user-friendly and practical interface is a key factor in why customers choose Colocall, often based on recommendations from friends.
While there have not been any terrible experiences, there have been some issues that customers have encountered. The main frustration stems from the administrators' tendency to disregard the adage "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." For example, they decided to update the software during a crucial period before the new year, causing inconvenience for customers. Additionally, the blocking of the entire account, including all websites, due to a script virus found in the backup folder, was seen as an unnecessary and frustrating occurrence.
Despite these minor setbacks, Colocall.net is generally praised for its reliability, speed, and reasonable restrictions. The hosting service has received positive feedback, with customers reporting that their websites are functioning properly. However, some customers did mention that they had to switch hosting services for undisclosed reasons. Overall, Colocall.net stands out among other hosting services for its performance and offerings, even though the administrators can sometimes be a source of frustration.Reviews on Colocall.netI strongly do not recommend this data center, as it is very weak and underdeveloped. Compared to other websites, it is like a dinosaur.
I hosted my servers with them for over 4 years, paying over 3800 UAH per month. When attacks started coming, they .. Read more »kicked me out. Other data centers fight for their clients, but these guys only choose those who are convenient for them.
They sent my equipment back to me, with all the locks broken as if someone used a crowbar. They are incredibly rude and disrespectful in their communication.I have been using Colocall for a significant period, around 10 years. It specializes in colocation and hosting. Although it is more expensive than Mirohost, which is highly recommended, there is a notable difference in the availability of the ImageMa .. Read more »gick package. On Colocall, it is included in all price plans, whereas on Mirohost, it is only available with the most expensive plan. Therefore, it is important to consider not only the price but also the offerings when making a decision. As for reliability, I am extremely satisfied with Colocall's performance. Any issues that arise (which is rare, happening about once a year) are promptly resolved.Mid-range hosting is available for 60 hryvnas, and although I am willing to pay more, the quality of the service is my top priority.
The interface is user-friendly and practical, which is why I chose this hosting based on recommendations from friend .. Read more »s who have used it in the past.
While I wouldn't say there were any terrible experiences, there were several issues that arose.
The main source of frustration for me is the administrators. They disregard the principle of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it."
1) During the busy period before the new year, when our online store is inundated with phone calls and heavy advertising, the administrators decided to update the software on December 30th. This day is crucial for us as we generate almost as much revenue as a whole month.
2) It is incredibly irritating when the site gets blocked due to trivial reasons. For instance, they found a script virus in the backup folder, resulting in the entire account, including all our websites, being banned. It is common knowledge that the backup folder contains a copy of the Joomla site for reference purposes.
Overall, there are no major issues. Compared to other hosting services, this one stands out in terms of its reliability and speed.
The administrators can often be quite frustrating.Our website is functioning properly and the restrictions are reasonable. The hosting service was excellent. I had four projects hosted there, although I unfortunately had to switch for reasons that are not worth mentioning. Medium level hosting. Virtual hosting for 60 hryvnias. Personally, I am willing to pay more, price is not important to me, quality of work is what matters.
I like the interface, everything is convenient and practical. I was originally inclined towar .. Read more »ds their service because of friends who worked there.
I can't say that there was anything very painful, but there were many different incidents.
The main thing that annoys me is the admins. They always act against the main rule "if it works, don't touch it, let it work."
1) An online store on December 30th, before New Year's Eve, phones are ringing off the hook, crazy advertising costs. The company is buzzing with work. The admins decide to update the software on the 30th. I don't know about other websites, but for us, New Year's Eve is one of the most profitable days of the year.
2) And it also annoys me when the website is blocked over trivial matters. (They found a script virus in the backup folder - they banned the entire account with all the websites - nobody cares that it's a backup folder and a copy of an old site is there for historical purposes)
Overall, there are no major complaints, compared to others, they are still decent in terms of reliability and speed of work.
Those admins, I tell you!I have been using Bell's services for a long time, probably around 10 years. They offer colocation and hosting in large portions, of course, it's more expensive than Mirohost, which is recommended here as one of the best. Once, a client tri .. Read more »ed to switch from Bell to Mirohost, and it turned out that, for example, the ImageMagick package is only available with the most expensive tariff plan, whereas Bell includes all these things in any tariff package.
Therefore, it is necessary to look not only at the price but also at the ratio of the price and what is included there.
In terms of reliability, Bell's performance also suits me very well. If any problems arise - once a year - they are resolved fairly quickly.We had a good working experience with favorable parameters. The hosting was decent. I had 4 projects on it, but unfortunately, I had to move due to... well, it doesn't matter :) |
